Pinoy Fear Factor Winner Arrested of Using Marijuana for His ADHD: Is It a Legal Defense?



Jommy Teotico, a Pinoy Fear Factor winner, was arrested for allegedly using marijuana in their residence in Laguna.

However, Teotico countered that he was using marijuana only for his Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).  He added that he had proof to show that such use was recommended by his psychiatrist (ABS-CBNnews.com, November 11, 2014).



Marijuana is one of the illegal drugs defined in Republic Act Number 9165 or otherwise known as the "Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002".  Thus,

Cannabis or commonly known as "Marijuana" or "Indian Hemp" or by its any other name. – Embraces every kind, class, genus, or specie of the plant Cannabis sativa L. including, but not limited to, Cannabis americana, hashish, bhang, guaza, churrus and ganjab, and embraces every kind, class and character of marijuana, whether dried or fresh and flowering, flowering or fruiting tops, or any part or portion of the plant and seeds thereof, and all its geographic varieties, whether as a reefer, resin, extract, tincture or in any form whatsoever.

As stated in R.A. No. 9165, the use of marijuana is unlawful.  It is not yet allowed in our jurisdiction.

Although, there was an initiative in the House of Representatives to allow the use of marijuana on medical purposes only, but the same was not yet materialized.  In fact, said initiative was backed and supported by the parents who allegedly allowed their children to use marijuane to treat their illnesses.

In other countries, the use of marijuana is already allowed.  But in the our country, unless and until there is a law allowing the use of it, it remains unlawful and illegal.

Thus, in the case of Teotica, even if he could prove and show that the alleged marijuana was for the treatment of his ADHD, it would not exonerate him of the crime of illegal use of marijuana.

Note: Pictures used herein are from Google and ABS-CBNnews.com respectively.





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Philippine Laws on Illegal Gambling

Image
Since the announcement of Philippine President Rodrigo Roa Duterte for the Philippine National Police to halt its operation on war against drugs and shift the fight against illegal gambling, hundreds of suspected individuals were apprehended allegedly involved with illegal gambling nationwide. In General Santos City for instance, there are at least 4 suspects are brought before our office for inquest investigation.  There suspects are either violating Presidential Decree (P.D.) No. 1602 or Republic Act No. 9287. It might be noteworthy to consider because the police officers are doing their job as mandated by law, but, most, if not all, of the suspects apprehended belong to the poorest of the poor.  We are still waiting at the time when we would face suspects who are the financier of these illegal gambling games. This image is taken from google. The following are the gambling laws of the Philippines: PRESIDENTIAL DECREE NO. 1602 It amended the criminal provisions of A
Read more

Bonds for Illegal Gambling

This post shall provide the updated recommended bonds for illegal gambling as of this writing. Presidential Decree No. 1602 (Prescribing Stiffer Penalties on Illegal Gambling): Section 1.   Penalties.  The following penalties are hereby imposed: (a) The penalty of prison correccional in its medium period of a fine ranging from one thousand to six thousand pesos, and in case of recidivism, the penalty of prision mayor in its medium period or a fine ranging from five thousand to ten thousand pesos shall be imposed upon:      1. Any person other than those referred to in the succeeding sub-sections who in any manner, shall directly or indirectly take part in any illegal or unauthorized activities or games of cockfighting, jueteng, jai alai or horse racing to include bookie operations and game fixing, numbers, bingo and other forms of lotteries; cara y cruz, pompiang and the like; 7-11 and any game using dice; black jack, lucky nine, poker and its derivatives, monte, baccarat, cuajao, pang
Read more

May the Court Appoint a Non-Lawyer to Defend the Accused?

Image
It is of common knowledge that once a case is filed in court, especially criminal case, against a person, he must be represented with a counsel or a lawyer. To be represented with a counsel is one of the fundamental rights of the accused. There are two types of counsels representing an accused in court.  These are counsel de parte and counsel de oficio. Counsel de parte is the counsel of choice of the accused engaged by him to represent him in court.  It is in line with his constitutional right to have a competent and independent counsel preferably of his own choice. Most often than not, this counsel de parte is a private practitioner and his legal services are not for gratis. However, if the accused cannot afford the services of a counsel, he must be provided with one. This counsel provided by court to defend the accused is known as counsel de oficio. As provided in the Revised Rules of Court of the Philippines, it is a duty of the court to inform the accused of his right to counsel.
Read more